top of page

Kafka vs Redis the right data platform for your needs

Updated: Jan 13

In the ever-evolving landscape of distributed data systems, Apache Kafka and Redis stand out as powerful tools, each with its unique strengths and best-fit use cases. In contemporary cloud architecture, applications are separated into independent building blocks known as services. Pub/sub messaging delivers immediate event notifications for these distributed systems. Kafka operates on a pull-based system, where publishers and subscribers use a shared message queue, allowing subscribers to pull messages as required. Conversely, Redis employs a push-based system, with the publisher sending messages to all subscribers when an event takes place.

But fundamentally, Kafka and Redis works differently.

Apache Kafka:

At its core, Kafka follows a publish-subscribe model, where data is organized into topics. Producers, responsible for generating data, publish messages to these topics, and consumers subscribe to the topics to process the messages. This decoupling of producers and consumers allows for a highly flexible and scalable architecture.

One of Kafka’s key strengths lies in its durability and fault tolerance. It achieves this through its distributed nature, where data is replicated across multiple broker nodes. This ensures that even if a node fails, data remains accessible and can be seamlessly recovered. This resilience makes Kafka particularly well-suited for mission-critical applications where data integrity and availability are paramount.

Furthermore, Kafka has become a linchpin in building modern, event-driven architectures. Its ability to handle large volumes of data and support diverse data formats makes it a versatile tool for integrating disparate systems. This is particularly relevant in microservices architectures, where Kafka acts as a reliable communication layer between services, facilitating seamless data exchange and maintaining system coherence.


Redis, an open-source, in-memory data structure store, has established itself as a versatile and high-performance solution in the world of data storage and caching. Originally developed by Salvatore Sanfilippo, Redis (Remote Dictionary Server) has evolved into a key-value store that excels in scenarios requiring low-latency access to data.

One of Redis’s standout features is its simplicity and ease of use. The straightforward key-value data model, combined with a rich set of commands for data manipulation, makes Redis accessible to both beginners and experienced developers. This simplicity extends to its deployment and configuration, contributing to its popularity as a go-to solution for caching and real-time analytics.

Redis’s versatility extends beyond a simple caching layer. It serves as a message broker with its publish/subscribe capabilities, enabling communication between different parts of an application or even between separate applications. This pub/sub functionality is crucial for building scalable and responsive systems, as it facilitates asynchronous communication and reduces coupling between components.

Message Handling:

Apache Kafka and Redis, both prominent in distributed messaging, exhibit distinctions in their queuing mechanisms.

Message Size:

Redis is optimized for small data packets due to its in-memory nature and limited storage capacity. It struggles with large data sizes and cannot efficiently store vast amounts due to RAM constraints. Kafka, designed for scalability, handles reasonably large messages, supporting up to 1 GB through compression and tiered storage.

Message Delivery:

Kafka consumers pull data with offsets, enabling detection and tracking of duplicate messages. In contrast, Redis employs automatic push to connected subscribers, with at-most-once delivery, lacking duplicate message detection.

Message Retention:

Kafka retains messages post-consumption, allowing clients to request lost data based on retention policies. Redis discards messages once delivered, and if no subscribers are connected, the messages are irretrievably lost.

Error Handling:

Redis focuses on client-Redis service interactions, addressing issues like timeouts and memory buffer limits. However, its key-value architecture limits robust error handling. Kafka excels with dead letter queues, where erroneous events are stored for analysis, retry, or redirection. The Kafka Connect API aids automatic task restarts during specific errors, ensuring consistent message delivery.

Performance Differences

In pub/sub messaging, Apache Kafka surpasses Redis due to its explicit design for data streaming. Kafka excels in scenarios where Redis is unsuitable.


Redis lacks support for parallelism, preventing simultaneous message reception by multiple consumers. In Kafka, messages can be concurrently distributed to multiple consumers within consumer groups, leveraging partition replication for synchronized message retrieval.


Kafka generally exhibits higher throughput than Redis pub/sub, handling larger data volumes efficiently. Kafka’s optimization involves storing messages in memory cache and storage, avoiding waiting for each subscriber. However, Kafka’s performance may degrade if consumers lag, necessitating disk reading, which is slower.

In contrast, Redis experiences decreased throughput with more connected nodes due to acknowledgment delays. Pipelining mitigates this issue but at the expense of increased messaging latency.


While both Kafka and Redis support low-latency data processing, Redis offers lower messaging times in milliseconds compared to Kafka’s tens of milliseconds. Redis excels in speed due to its primary data operations on RAM, but larger messages may impact its ultra-low-latency performance. Kafka’s additional time for partition replication introduces overhead to message delivery.

Optimizing latency in both systems requires careful considerations. For Kafka, compression reduces latency but extends processing time for compression and decompression. In Redis, latency factors include the operating environment, network operations, slow commands, and forking delays, which can be addressed by running the pub/sub delivery system on modern EC2 instances.

Fault Tolerance:

Kafka ensures fault tolerance by writing all data on a leading broker’s storage disk and replicating it across servers. In the event of server failure, subscribers retrieve data from backup partitions. Redis lacks default data backup and necessitates manual enabling. Redis uses in-memory storage, losing data on power down. To mitigate this, developers activate Redis Database (RDB) persistence, capturing periodic snapshots of RAM data on disk.



Apache Kafka


Message Size

Supports Messages up to 1 GB with compression and tiered storage

Designed for smaller message sizes.

Message Delivery

Subscribers pull messages from the queue.

Redis server pushes messages to connected subscribers.

Message Retention

Retains messages after retrieval

Does not retain messages

Error Handling

Robust error handling at the messaging level, including dead letter queue, event retry and redirection

Redis exceptions must be handled at the application level, dealing with timeouts, client limits, and memory buffer capacity


Supports parallelism; multiple consumers can retrieve same message concurrently

Does not support parallelism


Higher throughput due to asynchronous read/write

Lower throughput as the Redis server waits for a reply before sending messages to other subscribers


Low latency, slightly slower than Redis due to default data replication

Ultra-low latency, especially with smaller-sized messages.

Fault Tolerance

Automatically backs-up partitions to different brokers

Doesn’t back up by default. Users can enable Redis persistence with a risk of data loss.

5 views0 comments


bottom of page